Assessment onlySpecialist routes
Put the right entity on the record.
For a transaction that may require a Merchant of Record, Tax of Record, Importer of Record or Exporter of Record rather than another loosely defined provider handoff.
Map my record-party routeA provider-neutral comparison of feasible structures, named responsible entities, contracting boundaries, exclusions, economics and evidence obligations.
01 Good fit
Use this service when
- Digital sales with indirect-tax or local-selling complexity
- Physical routes requiring a destination importer
- A direct-sale versus MoR or ToR decision
- A transaction where legal seller, importer or exporter responsibility is unclear
02 What you receive
A decision-ready operating file
- 01Current and proposed responsibility maps
- 02MoR, ToR, IOR and EOR role comparison
- 03Product, corridor and underwriting question set
- 04Provider diligence and contracting checklist
- 05Funds, tax, customs and customer-data responsibility map
- 06Implementation route with excluded assumptions
03 Working sequence
From intake to a named next action.
sartha begins with the facts, makes assumptions visible and keeps each regulated decision with the qualified party responsible for it.
Separate each legal obligation from operational tasks
Compare sartha, direct and qualified-provider structures
Name the responsible entity only after qualification and contract
Scope before promise.
The route assessment is not itself an offer by sartha to assume a Merchant, Tax, Importer or Exporter of Record role. Any liable role must be held by the entity expressly named in the approved contract and transaction documents.